|
I was invited to run this event about six weeks before it was due to
be played. A quick look at the MSO C website reminded me that
it had been a 14 player event in 2003 and 12 player in 2002. I
gathered that in previous years the dates had clashed with
other backgammon tournaments and that the tournaments had only
been announced 2 or so weeks in advance. They had also played
Swiss format. Uldis Lapikens had won both years.
I considered that given I had 6 weeks warning, no other
tournaments of note were happening over the weekend this year
and with a change of format to Knockout (with Main,
Consolation, Last Chance and Suicide) we could attract 32
players. I also set up a morning workshop and, should we have
more than 32 players, a Tric Trac Tourno. I asked would
be players to register via a sub-website I wrote for the event
and let it be known that I would close registration in the
Knockout at 32 players.
In my emails with Paul Smith of MSO C I stated that I
considered that if an event that has the word Olympiad as part
of its title that medals should be awarded as a matter of
course. He replied that it was up to Tournament Directors to
award whatever they see fit but that this would come out of
the T.D.s cut of registrations. It is also traditional
in backgammon to award trophies to winners of brackets. With 4
brackets within the Knockout I set about getting 12 medals and
3 trophies.
Last year there had been an Optional Pool so this year I'd
have the same. However I decided to try out a slightly
different system. There would be a Pool for each Tournament.
£10 in the Main, £7 in the Consolation, £5 in the Last
Chance and £3 in the Suicide. Entry into each Pool would only
be allowed before players commenced play in that bracket. I was
pretty sure it would work well but the acid test would be on
the day.
2 days before the event we had 32 players registered and I was
forced to tell other players that they were welcome to come to
Cambridge but that I could not guarantee them a seat in the
Knockout though there would be space in the Tric Trac Tourno.
It's hard telling players this, but I find that a full
tournament runs so much better for those that do play in it
than a tournament that has byes. I'd prefer to run an
excellent tournament for slightly fewer players than a messy
tournament for more players.
I arrived at the venue at just before 9.30a.m. and was met by
Richard Biddle then Geoff Conn at the door. They helped me set
up things in the Drama Studio and shortly after we were joined
by players who had come along for the workshop.
Soon there were 3 tables of backgammon going in the workshop.
Essentially the matches were all chouettes each led by an
experienced player - Uldis, Richard and Geoff. Moves and strategies
were openly discussed, questions answered and hints on play
given. The novice players all said they had learnt a lot and
were well prepared for the tournament. Many thanx to the
"Tutors" for giving back to the game - it also set
the tone for the day of friendly competition.
As players arrived so they registered for the Tournament and
were explained how the optional pools would work. I was due to
close registration at 11.45 but we were still two registered
players missing so I held off (even though I shouldn't have)
until 12 o'clock. At 12 o'clock they were still missing so I
gave their seats away to the two other players that had come
along on spec (though 1 said he had registered). We had a full
32 players present. Stephen Turner (who ran this event in
2002, is a local player and was The British Open Winner 1996)
did the draw. Play commenced at 12.15.
Also a 6 player Tric Trac Tourno also got under way. I later
added another 1 player just to make it up to 21 matches to
play. TTTs are Round Robin 1 game matches affairs. 3 points
for a backgammon, 2 for a gammon, 1 for a straight win and,
here's the twist, 1/2 point for a loss. This means that to win
the TTT players must play for gammons. They might only be 1
games matches but they are highly interesting matches as
players try to blitz or backgame their opponent.
Notable losses in the 1st Round of the Main (7 pointers) were Al Hogg,
Richard Biddle, Alan Beckerson, Geoff Conn, John Broomfield
and Miranda Moore. Of 21 players that entered the Main Pool 9
were eliminated. There was only 1 item for this T.D. to rule
upon. A player (who usually plays live backgammon) wrote down
her pip-count before she started counting her opponents
pip-count. Quite rightly the opponent called me over. I was
staggered that a normally (now experienced) live player had
done this but apparently she was unaware that written aids are
illegal. Having never encountered this problem before I
consulted with Paul Lamford as to what is the normal procedure
in such cases. No cube action had taken place so it was
decided that a warning should be given and a point would be deducted
should the player do it again.
10 players signed up for the Consolation Pool as they entered
the 1st Round. They would be joined by a further 9 as players
entered in later Rounds.
Back in the Main notable matches included Rob (An Oxford Mathematics
Graduate who now lives in Cambridge) taking out Stephen
Turner, Dan Boxall winning over twice British Champion Paul
Lamford and Tim ruining Uldis Lapiken's changes of winning
this event for the third time.
The Consolation (5 pointers) 1st Round didn't go exactly the way I privately
though it would do either; Alan Beckerson, Geoff Conn and John
Broomfield were all having bad days. Results were begging the
question if mainly Internet players are stronger than mainly
Live players.
Having started a little late I was worried that we would not
meet our deadline to finish by. But players were enjoying themselves and
I'm loath to pressurise players to play faster than they do
naturally. I'm not a fan of the concept of clock rules - while
I agree that a tournament must be kept moving along I dislike
the idea of imposing strict rules regarding time. In future
I'll allow more time which unfortunately probably means an
earlier start time.
By now the Tric Trac Tourno was all played. Young Sam
had played well in every match but had come away the loser in
each (such is backgammon) but was awarded (as is traditional
in TTTs) with a bag of marbles for a 100% loss rate. In the
last TTT match I played Chris - To win the TTT I needed a
backgammon and Chris needed a gammon. I got the start of a
blitz on Chris, it got better and better and I had 7 of his
checkers stacked on my 1 point. But then it all went wrong as
he hit a trailing checker and he hit back again and again and
again. Surely I couldn't loss by a backgammon having only a
few rolls before looked good to win by a backgammon ?
Sometimes I really hate this game. Chris won another Live TTT.
The Last Chance kicked in and matches (3 pointers) took little
time to play once the players had been decided from previous
brackets.
Back in the Main Rob won over Alexis Hogg, Dan Boxall won over
Monica Beckerson, Ben Tarlow over Tim and Charlie over Stef
Rohan. Of the remaining players only Dan and Charlie had
entered the Pool.
Position 1
Cube action?
| |
Win
|
W(g)
|
W(bg)
|
L(g)
|
L(bg)
|
MWC
|
Cubeful
|
|
static:
|
0.626
|
0.202
|
0.012
|
0.101
|
0.004
|
54.34%
|
55.78%
|
|
1 ply:
|
0.640
|
0.215
|
0.009
|
0.110
|
0.004
|
54.61%
|
56.33%
|
|
2 ply:
|
0.658
|
0.218
|
0.012
|
0.098
|
0.003
|
55.31%
|
57.27%
|
|
Cube analysis
|
|
2-ply cubeless MWC 55.31% (Money: +0.445)
|
|
0.658 0.218 0.012 - 0.342 0.098 0.003
|
|
Cubeful equities:
|
|
1. Double, take
|
58.17%
|
|
2. Double, pass
|
60.30% ( 2.13%)
|
|
3. No double
|
57.27% ( -0.90%)
|
|
Proper cube action:
|
Double, take
|
In the Consolation those less experienced Knockout with
Consolations Tournament players were realising that this was
no easy ride as players knocked out in the later rounds of the
Main were fed into the Consolation. Having started in the 1st
Round of the Consolation Richard Biddle and Sean Williams and
having been entered in the 2nd Round Rick and Uldis became the 4
Semi-Finalists.
The Last Chance was the Tournament that was stalling for lack
of players coming though in good time. Paul Lamford had
omitted to enter the Last Chance Pool before he started play
in it. Having got to the Semi-Final
but effectively only playing for a medal and trophy and
realising that the bracket was stalling badly he elected to
withdraw from the Last Chance and enter the Suicide (1
pointers) and accompanying
Pool. This did wonders for speeding up the proceedings and
many thanks to Paul for doing so.
By now our Main Finalists had been decided - it was Rob versus
Charlie. The latter had by now won the Pool and was leading in
the Final Match for a long while. But it was Rob who came away
the winner of the match and thus the trophy and gold medal.
Charlie seems pretty happy with the silver medal and envelope.
Dan took the bronze medal.
The Suicide was the first bracket to finish. Diane was the
gold medallist (and Pool Winner), Suzy the silver and Miranda
the bronze. I first met Diane at The Fox Reformed in London
about 8 months ago. She didn't play in the Tournament at The
Fox that first evening because she was so in awe of those
present so sat as a nervous spectator on the side. Her
transformation has been astounding - her confidence level is
well up. Keep going Diane - better pastures
await.
The Last Chance drew to a conclusion as well. Geoff Conn took
the trophy, gold medal and Pool, Kambiz the silver and Sue
Keeble the bronze.
The hour was late now and we were well past our 6.00 p.m.
finish time. All the other Tournaments in the MSO C had
finished and our Final in the Consolation was still going on.
At 7.15 the Caretaker had finished all his other duties and
was ready to lock up. Richard and Sean were at Double Match
Point. They pleaded that the match would only take 5 minutes
to play out but upon inspection I saw that this was
potentially a very long backgame. The position was written
down, board closed and we followed other players to the
Pub.
As it happened the position didn't take long to play out. Sean
never got the first hit he needed to kick-start the backgame
and it was Richard who was awarded the trophy, the gold medal
and the Pool envelope.
Position 2
(Position taken to the Pub)
What
are Red’s winning chances ?
| |
Win
|
W(g)
|
W(bg)
|
L(g)
|
L(bg)
|
MWC
|
Cubeful
|
|
static:
|
0.461 |
0.082 |
0.001 |
0.159 |
0.005 |
46.12% |
46.12% |
|
1 ply:
|
0.451 |
0.113 |
0.002 |
0.195 |
0.007 |
45.14% |
45.14% |
|
2 ply:
|
0.460 |
0.094 |
0.002 |
0.188 |
0.006 |
46.01% |
46.01% |
Richard put the position though Snowie 3 ply. (the above was
put though GNU by Sean). Here is what Richard had to say about
it:
Originally thought I was about 75% favourite as you did not have an ideal back game set up. 3-6 point back game is slightly unconventional. So you can see how shocked I was that on a 3-ply cubeless evaluation on
Snowie, I am only 51% favourite.
A cubeless rollout backs this up with a 51.2% success rate.
It just goes to show that at double match point and when things aren't going your way, a back game, however unconventional, is a great strategy as there is no cube involved and you are in the game to the end.
I am a lover of backgames and play them more than I should, however, I hadn't rated your winning chances anywhere near 49%. I feel very lucky to have won the trophy. Well played.
|
We spent the rest of the evening in the Pub. The remaining
players had played enough backgammon for that day of their
lives and we turned our attention, ably encouraged by a few
drinks, to setting the world to rights. I had intended to
catch the 9.30 p.m. train back to London but it wasn't until
10.30 that I asked somebody what the time was. We caught the
last train back to town and played a chouette in the train
corridor.
Many thanx to Paul Smith and his team from MSO C and to all
the players that attended. Apologies to the players we did not
have room for - I'll continue my policy of closing 32 + player
tournaments that I run to 32 or 64 player tournaments - the
trick is to register up front. The Pools worked well and I'll
use that system again.
KNOCKOUT
CHARTS
TRIC TRAC TOURNO CHART
|